Monday, August 17, 2009

King Khan Kaun?

Remember the dimple-cheeked ‘Fauzi’, who crossed the ‘Dil Dariya’ to carve a niche for himself in the TV ‘Circus’? He later went on to achieve superstardom in the B-town through an amazing blend of talent, charm and luck. From apni Dilli’s boy-next-door Shahrukh Khan, he became the King Khan.

“I never wanted to eat chaat-papdi and golgappe on Delhi streets as an unrecognized face. I am proud of what I have achieved and where I have reached. I always knew I belonged to this place. I don’t miss my privacy. I love my super-iconic status,” says SRK abashedly. And we have always loved him for not being a hypocrite like other ‘superstars’, who now long for ‘privacy from prying fans’. He has a say on anything and everything under the Sun. Be it his ‘off and on’ race with Big B and AK to prove who’s a bigger star, his so-obvious tiffs with Dada or his unfounded remarks on the Little Master (Sunil Gavaskar), this Pathan knows how to court trouble.

When Emran Hashmi tried to fetch undue publicity by raking up the religious issue, he was quick to slam the attempt. But it is ludicrous to see Bollywood’s self-proclaimed clown trying to adopt the same tactic for promoting his upcoming flick ‘My Name is Khan’. He and his NRI-obsessed buddy Karan Johar now want to try their hand in serious cinema after a series of mindless a la-Rahul movies. But, after making the audience diabetic with heavy doses of candy-floss cinema, it would be really difficult task for them to convince the audience (and of course the critics) that they actually mean to do something ‘meaningful’. A God-sent opportunity came and they lose no time in minting it.

SRK was detained for 2 hours (as he claims) by the US airport authorities recently for questioning and he alleged unfair treatment. The airport officials clarified that they only questioned him for 66 minutes over his missing baggage as per the rule there. But King Khan was ‘deeply hurt’ by their behavior. Dropping the M-bomb, he said he was targeted as he belonged to a particular religion, thus creating a perfect publicity background for his upcoming movie which also deals with the post-9/11 scenario in the US, which reflects west bias against the Muslims.

The coincidence is far too much to digest. A ‘visibly upset’ SRK now threatens to avoid going to the US altogether due to this unfair treatment. It is a different matter that he has always put US at the top of his holiday list, a perfect location for carrying out his Temptation tour. It is one of the biggest markets for his movies. And the best part is that he has always taken so much pride in the fact that even the non-Hindi speaking audience, have loved his performances (if there have been any real ones). Suddenly, just some months ahead of the release of his movie, all this has changed for him.

He is calling American airport officials ‘biased’ just because they refused to recognize his superstar status and decided to treat him at par with others. It is a huge blow to his ego and has provided him a great opportunity to promote the theme of his movie through a ‘real experience’.


Gosh! When will SRK grow up? He must learn to stop treating his fans like fools through such tactics. And he must also learn the bitter lesson of humility and allow at least somebody to ask him King Khan Kaun, without feeling offended.

Monday, July 6, 2009

Pete Sampras is still the greatest tennis player

Roger Federer may have won his 15th grand slam title registering his name as the greatest tennis player in history, but that is only for the records' sake. The fact is Pete Sampras is and will always be the best ever. The world today may be going gaga over Federer's feat and the fact that he took just six years to reach this level against Pete's 12 years but has anyone really bothered to have a look at the list of the rivals of Sampras in comparison with Federer? In that case, it will be crystal clear who stands where. While Sampras had to edge out some of the greatest tennis players to reach the feat of 14 grand slams (Andre Agassi, Boris Becker, Jim Courier, Patrick Rafter to name a few), Federer never really faced any tough hurdle from anyone barring Nadal, who like other players of this generation has fallen an easy prey to injuries now, thereby giving a clear path to the so-called greatest player. Even the tennis experts feel that the great rivalries like that of Steffi-Monica or Sampras-Agassi have now become the thing of the past. Federer never really faced a stiff competition from anyone barring Nadal as others like Andy Roddick, who gave him a tough fight in Wimbledon final, never really could achieve the status of arch-rivals. Most of the other tennis players of today's generation have been quite inconsistent and injury-prone and could never give an Andre Agassi-like fight to a geat champion. The greatness of any player is judged by the greatness and quality of his rivals whom he has to beat on his way to top. Pete Sampras did just that by overpowering Boris Becker, who was regarded as the best net player of his time, and Andre Agassi who had the best return. There is no denying that Roger Federer is one of the bests in the history having won all grand slams including the elusive French Open, but his feat of 15 coveted titles comes nowhere near Pete's 14 wins. Sampras is and will remain the best player ever, even if Federer goes on to win another 15 grand slams, which doesn't look impossible, seeing the lack of quality rivals against him. Federer is one of the bests and certainly not the best as that title will always be reserved for Pete, if not in record books then certainly in the hearts of millions of fans like me.